Between 1976 and 1979, while the Santa Fe Circuit was in full force, no less than 500 people were kidnapped and brought to 7 Concentrations Camps.
The number of “direct retaliation” victims rose to 203.
37 were assassinated in the so-called “confrontations.” (8 of them are still "desaparecidas" and were seen alive when they surrended)
Keeping this reference in mind, 166 people were kidnapped:
84 remain disappeared
67 were freed
15 remain unknown – i.e. we do not know what happened to them and we cannot confirm that they are disappeared.
5 children were change the identidy and give them another familys

What they did to the “fighters” was criminal: they kidnapped them, stripped them of all defenses, tortured them and robbed them, stealing even their children. It was criminal to murder them and hide the bodies, ensuring no legal recourse could be had. Between 93% and 98% of the victims were neither terrorists nor combatants… There are no words to describe the lengths these criminals were capable of taking.

(See: Trial of the First Three Juntas, Federal Criminal and Correctional Court of Appeals, Buenos Aires, Argentina 1985)

Based on all available records, each and every clandestine detention center used numerous torture methods. In nearly all cases, these methods appear manifestly uniform; only small variations in these “tactics” or “methods” have been identified. The use of electrical currents, beatings and asphyxiation can be found in nearly all cases, regardless of the geographical location of the Camp, or which Forces were in charge.

(See: Trial of the First Three Juntas, Federal Criminal and Correctional Court of Appeals, Buenos Aires, Argentina 1985)

Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Criminal y Correccional Federal de la Capital Federal

THE “TESTED METHODOLOGY”

In the section titled Tested Acts of the Trial of the First Three Juntas, on December 9, 1985, the Federal Criminal and Correctional Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires described the various ways in which subversion was fought:

a) Capture all those who could prove suspicious in accordance with intelligence reports:

“…As I recall, I followed him, he was facing the municipal cemetery… we saw him meet with a man who was on a bicycle. We proceeded to arrest S... and brought him to the Police Quarters (Fourth Station)… I knew who he was because he had previously deployed intelligence assignments and was registered with the communist party.”

Declaration of Police Officer Eduardo Alberto RAMOS, case number 145 (1978), attached in Annex 1.

“…Sandwiched between insults and a few questions regarding my participation in the Student Center… they decided to cattle prod me…”

Testimony of Patricia Isasa before V.S., September 25, 1998.

b) Lead them to locations within military units, or locations under the control of military units:

“…The Fourth Station was designated as a detention center for those at the disposal of the Argentine Army, beginning March 24, 1976 by resolution of the Military Command…”

Declaration of Retired Commissioner Mario Jose FASINO, June 25, 1998, attached in Annex 1.

“…They moved me to the Fourth Station, we came in through a door that I recognized. They put me in a prison cell, alone… They took my husband to a different cell. Later I found out that his cell was only 2m x 1.5m…”

Testimony of Susana A. M., September 3, 1998, attached to the case of Ana O.

“… At dawn on August 7, they took me to the central hall of the Station… there I saw my school companion Viviana C.(16), as well as some men that had been moved with us, but in a police van… They shoved us toward our final destination… the Reinforced Infantry Guard…”

Testimony of Patricia Isasa before V.S., September 25, 1998.

c) Interrogate them through torment, with the objective of obtaining information regarding other people:

“…The man on the bicycle left, but that didn’t matter to us because in one way or another he was going to tell us who he was, once we had him detained…”

Declaration of Provincial Police Agent Víctor Hugo CABRERA, case number 145, attached in Annex 1.

“…The forced me to take off my clothes and they brought me to the neighboring room, they tied me to an iron chair, the kind found in gardens, they cattle prodded me, beat me and threatened me…”

Tesimony of Froilan A., September 3, 1998, attached to the case of Ana O.

“…They ordered me to take off my clothes, they secured my feet and hands to a metal bed frame. Naked, hooded, only 16 years old… they drowned me multiple times, they used the “dry submarine” tactic… Sandwiched between insults and a few questions regarding my participation in the Student Center… they decided to cattle prod me… they shocked me, they bent me backwards, and they began to beat me…”

Testimony of Patricia Isasa before V.S., September 25, 1998.

d) Submit them to inhumane living conditions with the objective of breaking their moral resistance:

“…Despite being pregnant, I was living under inhumane conditions… at the Fourth Station… The food consisted of tea and a little bit of boiled tripe. It was filth.”

Testimony by power of attorney of Beatriz P (7 months pregnant) delivered to V.S. by Patricia Isasa, September 25, 1998.

“The Reinforced Infantry Guard… being detained there, I lost my first pregnancy…”

Testimony of Susana A. M., September 3, 1998, attached to the case of Ana O.

e) Ensure absolute secrecy, for which the kidnappers had to:

• 1) Hide their identity

• • “…I had a white Fiat 600, my personal property. For security purposes, it had a license plate that did not correspond to the original registration of the car. I don’t remember the original plate number because I never used it…"

• • Declaration of Police Official Eduardo Alberto RAMOS, case number 145, attached in Annex 1.

• • “…I was in the Hospital Iturraspe, in the city of Santa Fe, and it being 8:00 pm, there appeared a group of about 8 to 15 people, none of whom wore military or police uniforms, though their faces were masked with handkerchiefs, scarves, etc. They had three cars without any identification plates…”

• • Testimony of Froilan A., September 3, 1998, attached to the case of Ana O.

• 2) Perform operations preferably at night

• • “…The kidnapping… at my home… at dawn on the 29th of May, 1976, together with my husband, Mr. Victor Rene COUTAZ…”

• • Testimony of Susana A. M., September 3, 1998, attached to the case of Ana O.

• 3) Ensure the victims remain totally incommunicado

• • “…Any contact with the detainees was completely prohibited, they were rigorously kept incommunicado”.

• • Declaration of Retired Commissioner Mario José FASINO, interview on June 25, 1998, attached in Annex 1.

• 4) Preferably keep the victims blindfolded

• • “…Regarding the procedure of pulling the hood over their eyes or preventing their vision, this was normal for these cases, so that the detainee wouldn’t recognize the place where he/she was being taken.”

• • Declaration of Police Officer Juan Eduardo GONZALEZ, case number 145, attached in Annex 1.

• • “…In the First Station, where I was held for 29 days, I had my hands and feet bound. My hands were tied behind my back and I was hooded. Every day they hit me.”

• • Testimony of Froilan A., September 3, 1998, attached to the case of Ana O.

• 5) Deny the existence of any kidnapping or detention center to any authority, family member or friend

• • “…Meanwhile, my parents were in a desperate search… they met with Mr. Fránklin WILLIAMS… “Private secretary” to Colonel José María GONZALEZ of the Military Intervention in the Province of Santa Fe… he was responsible for Command Artillery 121 of “Area 212”… WILLIAMS seems to know the motives and details of my kidnapping and forced “disappearance.” He told my father, “She is like “NN” at the First Station. Do not come back.”

• • “…They would hear this ruling many more times. They always came back, they always insisted, and they never abandoned their claims, complaints or petitions. Many more times they had to look for me. They always denied my whereabouts, though I was always dependent of the Military or Police Forces.”

• • Testimony of Patricia Isasa before V.S. on September 25, 1998.

f) Provide greater liberty to the inferior quadrants in order to determine the fate of the apprehended, i.e. whether they would be freed, placed at the disposal of the National Executive Power, submitted to military or civil processes, or physically eliminated:

“…The police personnel always troubled the detainees. The personnel at the Fourth Station used all forms of abuse, including sexual abuse.”

Testimony by power of attorney of Beatriz P (7 months pregnant) delivered to V.S. by Patricia Isasa, September 25, 1998.

The Court also stated in its ruling that an ordered system had been integrated based on:

• Guarantees of impunity to the executors/executioners.

• Ensuring that crime prevention agencies do not interfere in the performance of these procedures.

• Denial and concealment of the truth to all judges, organization, family members and foreign governments.

• Use of the state’s power to persuade local and foreign public opinion that the complaints were false and stemmed from an orchestrated campaign to discredit the state.

In this trial, it has been demonstrated that the orders given, gave way to the commission of a great number of crimes, including the unlawful deprivation of liberty, torture and murder.

In addition, it has been evidenced that in the execution of these acts, the subordinates committed other crimes that were not directly ordered but that can be considered natural consequences of the adopted system.

THE REPRESSIVE SANTA FE CIRCUIT

Of the five zones in which the country was divided during the repression, the Province of Santa Fe was Zone II, Subzone 21, under the direction of the Second Army Corps.

What they referred to as the Repressive Santa Fe Circuit was composed of a succession of interconnected fields. “The Gang” (the intelligence task force) operated in all of them.

This circuit received victims that had been kidnapped in the central and northern parts of the province ( ¾ of the entire province).
It is possible to enter the “circuit” through any of the fields. Each field had a specific function (breakdown, torture, exterminate, concentration) but could perform other functions if necessary.

The circuit consisted of 5 levels of repression: the victim could be broken down, tortured, disappeared, assassinated or freed.

LEVEL 1: The Breakdown

First Station, located at Primera Junta 2454, Santa Fe.

Information Services D-2, located at San Martín 3901, Santa Fe.

The detainee was brought there from the place of his/her kidnapping. There, the victim was “broken down”: hooded, handcuffed, isolated, forced in stressful positions (squatting, hanging by extended arms, etc), and psychologically tortured with threats, humiliation and sexual abuse.

LEVEL 2: Torture

Fourth Station, located at Tucumán 3595, Santa Fe.

The Little House: a group of different houses in the outskirts near Santo Tomé or Sauce Viejo. Some have still not been found.

The detained disappeared were moved to locations specially equipped to torture them. “The Gang” or the “Personnel of Area 212” were in charge.
The victims remained there for a minimum of two days and a maximum of two months. The repressors decided the amount of time each victim stayed.

LEVEL 3: Extermination

The House of U.D.A. (the Argentine Teachers Union), located on San Martín street, in front of the San Francisco Convent, in Santa Fe.

The victims were brought there to be exterminated, after which their bodies were “processed” according to convenience: they simulated “armed confrontation”; they buried them as “NN” in the Municipal Cemetary or in clandestine burial grounds. In some cases they were thrown into the Setubal Lagoon.

LEVEL 4: The Warehouse

“The Reinforced Infantry Guard” located at Gobernador Oroño 793, Santa Fe.

This level functioned as the Clandestine Detention Center and warehouse for the kidnapped. If there were new arrests that linked them in any way (e.g. known persons, co-workers, union members, faculty members, etc) they were moved to Level 2 to be tortured.

These four levels of repression were performed in absolute secrecy and illegality.

LEVEL 5: The legality of the jails

The victims were “legalized” (i.e. placed at the disposal of the National Executive Power, also referred to as “PEN”) or faced criminal charges in Federal Court. This Court (Judge Enrique Mántaras, as well as the Secretaries Bruno, Monti and Brusa) was absolutely an accomplice in the repressive apparatus.

The female victims were taken en masse by army planes to the Capital (about 450 km. away) to the Devoto Women’s Prison, where they were generally detained for various years.

The male victims were taken by truck to the Coronada Maximum Security Prison (about 70 km. away), where they also remained for years.

As this was a circuit, it is important to point out that one could enter through any “field.” The methodology was the same (break down, torture, concentration, with a open end of liberation, disappearance or assassination).

In all of the levels there were cases of “liberation” and “disappearance”

CHAZARRETA MENDEZ, Juan Clemente (First Station);

LOPEZ GARRAHAM de RODRIGUEZ, Alicia Adela (Fourth Station);

SORBA, Roberto Ismael (The Little House);

LEAL, María Cristina (Reinforced Infantry Guard).

The repression varied according to: the national or international political moment, economic interests, internal repression, etc.

In 1976 the number of survivors was greater than that of 1977.

There were less “confrontations.” The daily living conditions in the circuit’s “camps” became increasingly heinous.

In 1977 the management changed: in “Area 212” Colonel Juan Orlando ROLON assumed power;

in the Reinforced Infantry Guard, Commissioner Juan Calixto PERIZZOTTI assumed power;

in the U.R. 1, Commissioner Mario José FASINO assumed power.

As a consequence, the number of disappearances increased by 35%. There were more “confrontations.” In contrast, because of the visit by the International Red Cross, the daily living conditions in the “camps” did improve.

Comisaría 1ra. Primera Junta 2454, Santa Fe.

EDIFICIO: Dos Plantas

CANTIDAD HABITUAL DE DETENIDOS: 15 a 30 personas.

PERSONAL: Guardias, de 3 a 6 policías provinciales, “trabajaban” 24 hs y “descansaban” 48 hs.

ALIMENTACION: Irregular, una o dos veces al día.

ESTADO SANITARIO: Una letrina en planta alta y otra en planta baja.

Servicio de Informaciones D-2 San Martín 3901, Santa Fe

EDIFICIO: Dos Plantas

CANTIDAD HABITUAL DE DETENIDOS: 15 a 30 personas.

PERSONAL: Guardias, de 4 a 8 policías provinciales, trabajaban” 24 hs. y “descansaban” 48 hs.

ALIMENTACION: Irregular una o dos veces al día.

ESTADO SANITARIO: Un baño.

La Casita

Casa quinta en las afueras cerca de Santo Tomé o Sauce Viejo. Aun no fue ubicada.

EDIFICIO: Casa Quinta, planta baja con un sótano

CANTIDAD HABITUAL DE DETENIDOS: 10 a 20 personas

PERSONAL: Grupo “operativo” llamado “La Patota”

ALIMENTACION: Irregular

ESTADO SANITARIO: Un solo baño, las víctimas iban al baño luego de mucha espera con los brazos en alto.

Comisaría 4ta. Tucumán 3595, Santa Fe

EDIFICIO: Planta Baja.

CANTIDAD HABITUAL DE DETENIDOS: 20 a 30 personas.

PERSONAL: Guardias, de 3 a 6, policías provinciales, “trabajaban” 24 hs. y “descansaban” 48hs.

ALIMENTACION: una comida diaria inmunda, muy poca agua.

ESTADO SANITARIO: Letrinas y piletas de lavar.

Casa de U.D.A. (Unión Docentes Argentinos) calle San Martín, frente al Convento de San Francisco, Santa Fe.

EDIFICIO: Casa donde funcionó el gremio docente.

CANTIDAD HABITUAL DE DETENIDOS: 10 a 15 personas

PERSONAL: Guardias, de 3 a 6 policías provinciales, “trabajaban” 24 hs. y “descansaban” 48hs. y el Grupo “operativo” llamado “La Patota”

ALIMENTACION: Una vez por día

ESTADO SANITARIO: Un solo baño.

La GIR (Guardia de Infantería Reforzada.) Gobernador Oroño 793, Santa Fe.

EDIFICIO: Dos plantas de grandes dimensiones, albergaba también la “Guardia de Infantería Reforzada” (cuerpo de choque); el “Comando Radioeléctrico”, la “Unidad Regional 1”. Todas estas fuerzas pertenecientes a la Policía de la Provincia de Santa Fe. El campo estaba ubicado en la Planta Alta del ala derecha del edificio. Se accedía solamente por una escalera. La planta tenía: un hall de, una habitación para la guardia de hombres y una “cuadra” de 120m2 donde estaban alojados los 100 a 120 secuestrados varones. Un pasillo con una reja, llevaba al sector de mujeres, el que constaba de una sala de guardia, un pequeño lugar para comer y tres habitaciones. Una de 8 m2 otra de 20 m2 y la última de 36 m2.

PERSONAL: 3 guardias de 2 policías femeninas para las mujeres y 3 policías masculinos para los hombres, un jefe de guardias. Se alternaban 24 hs. por 48 hs.(“trabajaban” 24 hs. y “descansaban” 48hs.)

CANTIDAD HABITUAL DE DETENIDOS: 180 personas.

ALIMENTACION: 2 comidas (en estado de descomposición) y 2 veces “mate cocido” con pan tan duro que era imposible comerlo.

ESTADO SANITARIO: Un baño en cada sector.

PERSONAS ASESINADAS o MASACRADAS EN LOS LLAMADOS “ENFRENTAMIENTOS CON FUERZAS DE SEGURIDAD”

24 de Marzo del 76’ Primera Junta 3446
1. LOPEZ KELLER, Fernando Lucio
2. CATTANEO, Carlos José Manuel

04 de JUNIO del 76’“Comisaría 1ra” Primera Junta 2454
3. CHAZARRETA MENDEZ, Juan Clemente

10 de Junio del 76’
4. PELAYES GULLAUME, Juan Enrique

11 de Septiembre del 76’ Martín Zapata 2526
5. FONSECA SABA, Miguel Angel
6. NN (Masculino)
7. NN (Femenina) Herida

13 de Septiembre del 76’ Lavaise 4467
8. FONSECA SABA, Ana María R. 376.630
9. BERNAL, Antonio Roque

06 de Octubre del 76’Aristóbulo del Valle y Javier de la Rosa
10. GALUPPO MILICI, Mario Oreste
11. SAUR, María Graciela (desaparecida) Leg. CONADEP 6.581

06 de Octubre del 76’ Rivadavia 7251
12. FADIL NUÑEZ, Luis Alberto
13. RAMIREZ, Alicia Beatriz

07 de Octubre del 76’ Pedro Ferré 1936 /1980
14. TROSSERO CANTIN, Susana Beatriz Guadalupe
15. FONTANA PAVON, Alfredo Agustín R 383.383
16. CORIA PROCK, Silvia Edith (de FONTANA)R 383.382
17. ANGEL, Adriana Alicia R 418.244

27 de Octubre del 76’ 4 de Enero
18. GOICOCHEA DAGNINO, Luis Eduardo

01 de Diciembre del 76’25 de Mayo y Lisandro de la Torre
19. MARTINAZZO AROLFO, Arnaldo Santiago
20. NN (Masculino) (60 años)
21. NN (Femenino)

03 de Enero del 77’ (via pública) Pedro Ferré 3300
22. MENDICUTE MACHADO, Antonio Martín
23. MEURZET, Nora

04 de Enero del 77’
24. MUJICA TISCORNIA, María Josefina
25. MARTIN, Antonio
26. VENTURA, José Pablo
27. BIANCHI, Adriana

19 de Enero del 77’ Ituzaingó y Las Heras
28. PIOTTI AYMAR, Jorge Luis (Leg. CONADEP 7.592) R. 385.435
29. FRIGERIO FERNANDEZ, Carlos Mario R 383.003
30. GOMEZ RIOS, Ileana Esther R 390.870
31. PAZ, Humberto Eduardo (Alias “Cholo”)
32. NN (Masculino) (Alias “Gordo Mario”)

24 de Marzo del 77’ Javier de la Rosa y Guemes
33. GOMEZ CASTRICINI, José Luis
34. NN
35. NN

Presuntamente operativo realizado por El Tío , El Pollo y EL Rey, según lo manifestado J. J. P., en testimonio ante Conadep de su testimonio. P. T., A. M. C., y A. B. ante notario que se acompaña

11 de Abril del 77’ Pasaje Liniers 4538
36. ELIAS ACUÑA, Nilda Noemí (Leg. CONADEP 3.042)
37. SILVA, Luis Ismael actualmente “desaparecido”

31 de Mayo del 77’Distrito Militar de Santa Fe
38. ALMIRÓN VEGA, Víctor Ricardo (Leg. CONADEP 3.147)

PERSONAS “ DESAPARECIDAS ” EN EL CIRCUITO SANTA FE SEGÚN EL INFORME DE CONADEP publicado en el “NUNCA MAS”

1 ACORONI, Marcelo (01-11-76)
2 AGUIRRE, (Reconquista (24-03.76)
3 ALVAREZ, MarcelinoL.E. 6.260.580 (04-11-76) Leg. CONADEP.7.606
4 AMERI, Raúl Hector (18-02-76) Leg. CONADEP .2.483
5 ANGEROSA, Daniel Martín L.E.8.356.596 (17-02-76) Leg. CONADEP .6.593
6 ARAYA, Carlos Maria L.E.6.043.362 (01-06-77) Leg. CONADEP 6.868
7 BARRAL, Cecilia (02-08-76)
8 BENUZZI TORRENS, Angela (14-10-76) Leg. CONADEP .4.628
9 BIOSETTI, Carlos Alberto (23-07-76)
10 BOSCH YACUZZI, Alcides L.E.5.269.932 (22-11-75)
11 CALAFELL, Orlando Germán L.E.7.979.561 (01-06-76)
12 CARLUCCI, FINA, Isabel Ángela DNI 10.430.517 (10-08-76) Leg. CONADEP . 7.368
13 CARROZA, Rafaél A. DNI 6.180.524 (21-07-76 )
14 CERVATO, Cesar (01-06-75) Leg. CONADEP 6.443
15 CHERRI GEISER, Nestor Hugo DNI 11.832.458 (19-08-77) Leg. CONADEP .3823
16 CHURRUARIN, Raúl (01-08-77)
17 CIANCIO, Ana María (30-03-76) Leg. CONADEP .2.666
18 DE CÓRDOBA, Luis (12-04-80)
19 DEAN, Arturo Fidel (21-11-76) Leg. CONADEP .7.601
20 DI DOMENCIO, Laura (01-09-76) Leg. CONADEP 0.533
21 DI FIORI, Ramón Antonio DNI .7.822.406 (21-07-76) Leg. CONADEP 7.342
22 DONNET, Hugo René L.E. 6.306.379 (03-01-77)
23 ECHEGOY, Juan Carlos (Reconquista) (01-12-76)
24 EIER , Graciela María DNI 2.658.497 (19-05-77) Leg. CONADEP .4.379
25 FARESTELLO, Marta María DNI 10.726.920 (19-08-77)
26 FEDELICH, Juan Antonio (03-08-77)
27 FERESIN, Emilio Osvaldo 4.981.684 (10-02-77)
28 FERNANDEZ, Manuel DNI 4.247.790 (10-11-76)
29 FERNANDEZ SALOMON, Gloria Cristina 800.426 (19-03-77) Leg. CONADEP 6.870
30 FINSTERWALD, Orlando DNI 11.872.892 (17-02-76) Leg. CONADEP .4.448
31 FLEMING ARAYA, Catalina L.C. 6.288.792 (01-06-77) Leg. CONADEP 6.867
32 FORGIONI, Elisabeth Betsabe DNI 23.358.248 (02-07-82) Leg. CONADEP 4.036
33 FORGIONI, Gustavo Adrián DNI 23.358.249 (02-07-82) Leg. CONADEP 4.067
34 GAUTO , Hugo Horacio (01-04-76) Leg. CONADEP .4.703
35 GONZALEZ, María Amelia 5.392.459 (26-02-77)
36 GONZALEZ GENTILE, Juan Carlos L.E.8.347.993 (12-02-77)
37 GUASTAVINO, Enrique Gerardo L.E.8.398.320 (17-02-76) Leg. CONADEP 6.597
38 GUTIERREZ, Carlos L.E. 11.672.592 (01-10-76)
39 HATTENER BOIDI, Reinaldo Alberto DNI 10.636.095 (25-01-77) Leg. CONADEP 3226
40 KLOTZMAN, Ricardo Horacio (28-08-76)
41 LARTIGA, Alberto Hipólito (01-01-75) Leg. CONADEP.2.632
42 LEAL, Cristina (vista por Patricia Isasa (24-03-76)
43 LESCANO, Eduardo
44 LOPEZ, Antonio Angel L.E.6.075.887 (27-09-76)
45 LOPEZ GARRAHAN, Alicia Adela de RODRIGUEZ (21-10-76) Leg. CONADEP 2.658
46 MANERA, Hermes Juan Bautista L.E.6.256.120 (01-07-76)
47 MARINI, Mario Osvaldo (09-12-75) Leg. CONADEP 1.011
48 MEDINA, Osacar Alberto DNI 10.528.998 (20-10-76)
49 MEGNA, Hugo Alberto DNI 12.720.775 (04-09-77) Leg. CONADEP .2.145
50 MONCHIETTI, Rogelio (Coronda) (01-06-78)
51 NAVARRO, Orlando
52 NEGRO ALVAREZ, Raquel L.C. 6.030.345 (02-01-78) Leg. CONADEP 4.456
53 OCANO, (24-03-76)
54 PALACIOS, Hilda Flora DNI 10.654.552 (06-11-77)
55 PARTIDA, Norberto Aldo DNI 10.671.411 (20-08-77) Leg. CONADEP 0730
56 PEPE, Carlos Miguel 370.325 (19-08-77) Leg. CONADEP.3.305
57 PEREZ, Carlos Alberto (28-12-76) Leg. CONADEP 2.566
58 PEREZ, Ricardo Adrian (Santo Tomé) 6.651.868 (21-04-77) Leg. CONADEP 0032
59 PON, Gustavo Adolfo L.E. 5.950.764 (01-03-76) Leg. CONADEP .7.149
60 PONCE DE LEON, Rubén L.E. 5.093.409 (01-09-77) Leg. CONADEP 1.776
61 RITVO , Moises Alberto DNI 11.933.056 Leg. CONADEP .0.713
62 RODRIGUEZ, José Martín 8.446.649 (00-00-81) Leg. CONADEP 4.099
63 RUBINELLI, María Luisa (20-03-77)
64 RUIZ BORDESIO, Olga Beatriz L.C.5.812.346 (20-09-77)
65 SANCHEZ RAYNA, Olga Teresita (27-02-78) Leg. CONADEP 7.599
66 SAUR GALUPPO, María Angélica DNI 10.543.464 (21-09-76) Leg. CONADEP 6.581
67 SEDRÁN CARULLO, Elsa Guadalupe DNI 272.369 (01-11-77) Leg. CONADEP 6.863
68 SEGGIARO, Osvaldo Angel L.E. 6.945.962 (19-01-77) Leg. CONADEP.0.444
69 SILVA RIOS, Antonio Inocencio DNI 12.470.070 (16-02-76) Leg. CONADEP 2.867
70 SIMMERMAN MANI, Ana María (01-01-77)
71 SOLÉ RIVAS, Alberto Nestor DNI 11.061.904 (01-10-77) Leg. CONADEP.2.362
72 SORBA, Roberto Ismael (21-01-76) Leg. CONADEP 3.739
73 SORIA KUJARCHUK SKLATE, Teresa DNI 10.280.070(17-6-76) Leg. CONADEP0.752
74 SUAREZ, Roberto Daniel L.E.11.278.774 (01-08-77) Leg. CONADEP 1.421
75 TASADA MEGNA, Adriana Elsa DNI 13.169.169 (04-09-77) Leg. CONADEP 4.309
76 TORTERAU, Mario Luis DNI 11.085.565 (26-02-76)
77 TROD, Jorge Luis L.E. 7.676.734 (10-01-78) Leg. CONADEP .0.509
78 TRUJILLO, Orlando Rubén L.E.10.316.738 (25-04-77)
79 VEGA FADRE, Obdulia (05-01-77)
80 VERDOU ESPINOSA, Luis Alberto LE 10.523.242 (20-08-77) Leg. CONADEP 1.437
81 VILLALBA, Rubén Argentino
82 WHITE, Guillermo Horacio DNI 10.779.947 (10-02-77) Leg. CONADEP .7.148
83 ZABALA, (Reconquista) (24-03-76)

BEBES QUE LES FUE CAMBIADA SU IDENTIDAD:

1 Carolina GUALLANE (Encontró su identidad)
2 Laura ACOSTA (restituida)
3 Paula MOLINA (restituida)